Tennys Sandgren vs Jan Choinski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Sandgren vs J. Choinski

Tennys Sandgren
USA
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
34
Age
29
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'5" (196 cm)
740
C. Rank
129
41
Best Rank
126
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.3M
Career Money
$291.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Jan Choinski
GBR
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
34
Age
29
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'5" (196 cm)
740
C. Rank
129
41
Best Rank
126
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.3M
Career Money
$291.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Sandgren 1 - 0 Choinski
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tennys Sandgren winning 2 and Jan Choinski winning 0. The last match between Tennys Sandgren and Jan Choinski was at the Las Vegas Challenger, 20-10-2017, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sandgren | 1 |
| Choinski | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Las Vegas Challenger(10-20-17)
Tennys Sandgren
6
6
Jan Choinski
1
0
T. Sandgren vs J. Choinski H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,256,263 | Career Prize Money | $291,405 |
| 56.43% (421-325) | Career Total W/L | 59.21% (418-288) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 16 | Titles | 18 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
T. Sandgren vs J. Choinski Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jan Choinski has won 46.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tennys Sandgren, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jan Choinski has won 42.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tennys Sandgren has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jan Choinski has saved 54.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jan Choinski winning 60.32% (W/L 38/25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tennys Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/10). Jan Choinski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 245/143), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 6/17).
- Player level: In the last year, Tennys Sandgren has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jan Choinski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 36/20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tennys Sandgren winning 1 times and Jan Choinski being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tennys Sandgren winning 2 and Jan Choinski winning 0.
- The last match between Tennys Sandgren and Jan Choinski was at the Las Vegas Challenger, 20-10-2017, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:57.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tennys Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jan Choinski has played against players with an average rank of 246.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jan Choinski has won 78% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tennys Sandgren has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jan Choinski has converted 25.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tennys Sandgren vs Jan Choinski Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Sandgren vs J. Choinski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:47:57 | Average Match Time | 0:47:57 |
| 58% (26/45) | 1st Serve % | 71% (27/38) |
| 81% (21/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 27% (3/11) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 66% (25/38) | Return Points Win % | 31% (14/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sandgren 0%, Choinski 53%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sandgren 0%, Choinski 50%.
Break Points Saved %: Sandgren 0%, Choinski 67%.
T. Sandgren Recent Matches Played
J. Choinski Recent Matches Played

T. Sandgren vs J. Choinski Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.43% (421/325) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.21% (418/288) |
| 55.82% (993/786) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.07% (936/704) |
| 52.11% (8948/8222) | Games Win/Loss | 52.98% (8128/7214) |
| 57.93% (241/175) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.10% (60/53) |
| 52.84% (93/83) | Clay Win/Loss | 63.14% (245/143) |
| 57.14% (76/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.79% (107/75) |
| 52.38% (11/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 26.09% (6/17) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 4008 | Aces Total | 1983 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1355 | Total Double Faults | 997 |
| 1:18:11 | Average Match Time | 1:22:9 |
| 532.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 237.18 |
| 61% (25668/42295) | 1st Serve % | 65% (26539/40684) |
| 73% (18700/25668) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (18022/26539) |
| 50% (8246/16625) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (7303/14145) |
| 38% (1428/3756) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1795/4112) |
| 37% (15591/42108) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16420/40767) |
| 43.86% (25/32) | Slam W/L | 31.58% (6/13) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 40.86% (38/55) | Main Tour W/L | 38.71% (12/19) |
| 55.87% (195/154) | Challenger W/L | 55.24% (174/141) |
| 70.89% (151/62) | Futures W/L | 66.57% (225/113) |
| 57% (402/706) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (405/685) |
| 46% (17/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 52% (161/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (103/200) |
| 47% (110/236) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (122/225) |
| 83% (434/360) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (396/350) |
| 17% (434/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (396/46) |
| 20% (312/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (309/67) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:15 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
2.43
W2
1.48
06:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.69
W2
2.02
03:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.182
W2
4.15
12:30 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.49
07:30 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.31
W2
1.53
06:00 PM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
2.35
W2
1.51
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Sebastian Baez vs Alvaro Guillen Meza Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia